Time has an interesting article on experts, their studies, and their tendency to be wrong:

Experts and Studies: Not Always Trustworthy

Anyone who’s spent anytime looking at diets won’t be surprised. Low-fat, high-fat, low carb, fibre, exercise: all have vast seas of conflicting studies.

Gary Taube’s excellent book Good Calories, Bad Calories is an interesting walk through some of the science and processes that shape this issue in the weight loss and health fields. We blogged about it here: Diet and The Philosophy of Science which opened with the following suggestion:

“As strange as it sounds, if you want to lose weight, it is worthwhile to learn something of the philosophy and practice of science.”

And InnerPlate.com is built to that philosophy: find your own evidence in your diet history. Trust your results, and find what works for you. InnerPlate.com is uniquely built in it’s focus on commitment periods, weeks, and returning feedback on your efforts across these different periods. Once you start, everything is driven by feedback and awareness and commitment generated by that feedback.

The longer InnerPlate.com has run, the more important this concept – trust only your results-  has become to us. And the results aren’t just weight loss, but ability to stick to the losing weight, do so consistently, and do so without too much hunger. They are all related, and strong feedback allows you to tune your diet to optimize all three- results, consistency and comfort.

As we finish the next version of our site, this will be our central focus – only trust your results. YOUR results. Not mine, not theirs. There will still be the blog, and information and ideas, but it will be there to help you find your path and will focus on finding the path, rather then suggesting the path.


{ 0 comments }

Finding your stable daily calories can be a bit daunting. There are all kinds of different measures out there, they often disagree, and we often aren’t sure what our activity levels are according to the calculations. A scientific test can be done, but they are expensive and not very widely offered. But there is an easy answer- take your best guess, track your calories, and compare the results. Try different formulas and use the one that is the best match!

When I started my diet a year ago, I used a calculation that said my stable daily calories were 2300. Imagine my surprise when I lost 5 lbs eating 2350 calories on average! As my diet theory was to track and adjust my behaviour based on a constant feedback loop, I didn’t mind the 2350 vs 2300, and learning that 2300 was so very wrong was a huge benefit.

I then tried a number of different stable calorie equations (= basal metabolic rate(BMR) + activity calories) and found one that matched- the Harris-Benedict and a surprising admission that I wasn’t as sedentary as I thought. Coaching soccer and running after 3 kids must add up.

Then came my plateau. It was after Christmas, and I ate 2300 calories per day on average for all of January, taking a slow road back into my diet after Christmas fun. And lost no weight. Where was my weight loss? Had my body metabolically revolted against weight loss? Had I lost excessive lean muscle mass having dropped 20 lbs in 6 months? What was going on?

I adjusted my stable daily calories to match my weight loss (none!) and continued on through February, striving for a new deficit based on my experimentally determined stable daily calorie rate.

Now calories in matched my weight loss again! But I still wondered what happened, and so I finally got a round to doing the numbers again.

Diet Start- Harris-Benedict

Age: 39, Weight: 235, Height: 6 feet,

Activity Level: moderate 3 times per week.

DAILY STABLE CALORIES = 3006

Now remember, another website had said 2300! That’s a big difference. I had started trying to diet at 1600 per day, for a 700 deficit, but it was too much, I landed at 2350, and still lost weight. Then I did more experimenting with different formulas and found a good fit.

But now my daily stable calories were 2540 based on my January weight loss. What was going on? Well, three things had changed- I had lost 20 lbs, I was doing less activity in the winter, and I had aged, turning 40. Running the Harris-Benedict equation with these three changes:

Diet @ 6months- Harris-Benedict

Age: 40, Weight: 220, Height: 6 feet,

Activity Level: low/none

DAILY STABLE CALORIES = 2503

Wow. I needed 503 calories per day less then last summer. And here I thought I had gotten better at managing my diet discipline and improving my calorie deficits. And this was almost a perfect fit for my experimentally calculated 2540.

Lets see what happens approximately 1 month later with weight loss based on this new stable rate:

Diet @ 7months- Harris-Benedict

Age: 40, Weight: 211, Height: 6 feet,

Activity Level: low/none

DAILY STABLE CALORIES = 2435

The weight loss matched my calorie intake to within .2 pounds. But wow! Another 70 calories less. After another couple of months, there will be a huge impact here. Even 70 is pretty huge: 70 * 365 days / 3500 calories/lb = 7lbs a year. Another month, and 140 cals would be roughly 14 lbs a year in wieght loss opportunity lost, and possibly the impression of a new plateau.

Now what happens when my activity level increases with the warmer weather…

Diet @ 6months- Harris-Benedict

Age: 40, Weight: 220, Height: 6 feet,

Activity Level: moderate 3 times per week

DAILY STABLE CALORIES = 2790

Up 300 calories. But still 216 calories less then six months ago. So in six months, by virtue of weight loss and age alone, I need 200 calories less per day. That’s 6000 calories- almost 2 lbs – a month of weight loss that I would be expecting and not getting if this went unnoticed. Over a year, that’s 73000 calories and 20 lbs. This is weight loss I would have been expecting, but not finding due to the impact of lost weight.

With less activity, I was missing 500cal/day of weight loss. Assuming I never noticed, I would have 1) stopped losing weight, and 2) missed the opportunity for 52 lbs of weight loss in a year if I had adjusted and maintained a similar calorie deficit (assuming I had 52 left to go- it’s actually 31- but it does mean hitting my goal in the middle of the summer versus at Christmas).

Not only have I learned this by tracking my weight versus calories for the last six months, but I know it to be accurate. My predicted weight loss in the last 2 months versus my calorie deficit estimate (with the correct numbers) match to within 1/4 of a pound. That’s on 10 lbs lost. This means I trust I will see progress over the next 6 months so long as I stay aware and mindful of my eating inputs.

My recommendation- run the numbers over your expected/desired milestones in the next 6 months and year. What is the impact of 20, 30, and 40 lbs lost. Then pay attention- that plateau you are seeing may just be an illusion.

And by learning your true stable daily calorie rate, and gaining a sense of trust generated by an effective awareness and feedback mechanism, you will have a tool lets you know, in no uncertain terms, that you will be successful.

{ 0 comments }

Diet and The Philosophy of Science

February 23, 2010

As strange as it sounds, if you want to lose weight, it is worthwhile to learn something of the philosophy and practice of science. And more diet and health books are opening with a short discourse on the topic, as they try to explain how so many well-intentioned researchers can be violently at odds on [...]

Read the full article →

Paleo Diet and The Twelve Minute Fitness Program

February 3, 2010

The Paleo Diet is slowing taking off and gaining broader acceptance. In many ways, it’s similar to the Atkin’s Diet, following a similar theory of insulin resistance and blood chemistry. But it’s driving forces are very different different- whereas Atkin’s was formulated on the concept that carbs were bad and the cause of weight gain, [...]

Read the full article →

The First Two Weeks: Finding Your Stable Calories

August 14, 2009

The InnerPlate diet is focused on portion awareness. It’s a mindful approach to the right portions for losing weight, and the right portions for staying at a healthy weight. It does so by creating a feedback loop- what you eat is tracked, and it shows how you are doing. You are then motivated at multiple [...]

Read the full article →

Study blames over-eating, not poor exercise for US obesity

May 8, 2009

Study blames over-eating, not poor exercise for US obesity With all the dietitians and health pundit offering such certain advice on health and exercise, most people would be surprised at how little study has been done regarding these “facts” that are presented. Well here’s a fact- the rise of health clubs has mirrored the rise [...]

Read the full article →

Welcome to FeedbackDiet.com!

March 18, 2009

Hi, Welcome to FeedbackDiet.com! So here we are. We hope you like it. Regards, The FeedbackDiet.com Team

Read the full article →